Amplify Amplify your take on things.  Join Spaceweaver on Amplify

Spaceweaver | My Amplog

Electrical stimulation produces feelings of free will

No Commentary

Amplifyd from scienceblogs.com

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchWhen it comes to the human brain, even the simplest of acts can be counter-intuitive and deceptively complicated. For example, try stretching your arm.

Nerves in the limb send messages back to your brain, but the subjective experience you have of stretching isn’t due to these signals.
The feeling that you willed your arm into motion, and the realisation that you moved it at all, are both the result of an area at the back of your brain called the posterior parietal cortex.
Parietal.jpg

Dualist philosophers like Descartes believed that the mind and consciousness exist outside the physical world, producing our actions by interacting with the physical meat of our brains. The idea has become commonplace, but it’s challenged by neuroscientific studies like this one, which show that the conscious intention to move emerges from electrical activity in neurons, tangible objects that are all too real.

Volition.jpg
See more at scienceblogs.com
 

Computers have a lot to learn from the human brain, engineers say

If they have the number right, its only a thousand fold short of the brain computation power and memory. Almost there…

Amplifyd from www.sciam.com
Computers are lauded for their speed and accuracy, but they don't hold a candle to the human brain when it comes to tackling complex mathematical problems, Dharmendra Modha, director of cognitive computing at the IBM Almaden Research Center, said at today's event. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the U.S. Defense Department's research arm, last year gave Modha and his colleagues $4.9 million for a project called “SyNAPSE,” through which they are trying to reverse-engineer the brain's computational abilities to better understand its ability to sense, perceive, act, interact, and understand different stimuli.
“We have no computers today that can begin to approach the awesome power of the human mind,” Modha said. A computer comparable to the human brain, he added, would need to be able to perform more than 38 thousand trillion operations per second [[http://www.petaflop.info/]] and hold about 3,584 terabytes of memory. (IBM's BlueGene supercomputer, one of the worlds' most powerful, has a computational capability of 92 trillion operations per second and 8 terabytes of storage.)
Although the brain is still not well understood, Modha said, “there is enough quantitative data for us to be able to begin putting together the pieces.” He predicted that by 2018 computers will be able to simulate the workings of the human brain, a breakthrough that will provide researchers with unprecedented insight into how the complex organ operates.
In addition to boosting computer performance, enhanced understanding of the brain will enable people to communicate directly with machines, whether they are robots or mechanized prosthetic limbs. Primates have already proved that such brain-machine interfaces are possible, Miguel Nicolelis, co-director of Duke University Medical Center's Center for Neuroengineering, said during the conference. The researcher and his colleagues last year successfully implanted electrodes in the brain of a monkey in North Carolina that enabled him to control a robot on a treadmill in Kyoto, Japan.
Nicolelis and his team have developed a microchip they expect will allow human brains to communicate with robots using only brain signals and enables the bots to return messages directly to the brain, without the use of sight or touch. Nicolelis said that he hopes the technology will be sophisticated enough to implant into a human brain by 2012 and enable a completely quadriplegic patient to walk again.
Read more at www.sciam.com
 

New games powered by brain waves

Amplifyd from www.physorg.com
Mindflex game
An elderly Chinese woman wearing a headset concentrates intensely on a small foam ball and it begins to rise slowly into the air.
It’s not magic, but rather the latest game from toy maker Mattel, which allows players to move a ball around an obstacle course by using just their powers of concentration.

Focusing on the ball causes a fan in the base of the game — called Mind Flex — to start up and lift the ball on a gentle stream of air. Break your concentration and the ball descends.

Once a player has the ball in the air they need to try to weave it through hoops, towers and other obstacles.

Mind Flex relies on EEG technology to measure brain wave activity through a headset equipped with sensors for the forehead and earlobes.

The game, which will be available in September for 79.99 dollars, is being displayed by Mattel at the annual Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

See more at www.physorg.com
 

In a report this week USA Today newspaper said game maker Uncle Milton plans to release a similar game this year. Called “Force Trainer” it is named after “The Force” powers of Yoda and Luke Skywalker in the popular Star Wars films.

The game calls for players to lift a ball inside a transparent tube using their powers of concentration.

“It’s been a fantasy everyone has had, using The Force,” the daily quoted Howard Roffman, president of Lucas Licensing, as saying.

“Force Trainer” also uses electroencephalography, or EEG, to measure electrical activity in the brain recorded on a headset containing sensors.

Pharmaceutical Love Potion: Not Yet…

Amplifyd from blog.wired.com
Flamingoheart
For those of you perplexed by love’s elusiveness, take heart: Science is on the case. But even if researchers can turn love into peer-reviewed literature, they might not be able to bottle it.
“People think we’re going to get a love potion, and that’s nonsense,” said Helen Fisher, a Rutgers University evolutionary anthropologist. “I don’t think they understand how complex the brain is, and what a powerful role experience plays.”
Fisher’s comments were prompted by an essay, entitled “Love: Neuroscience reveals all” and published Wednesday in Nature
This research shows how a “biochemical chain of events,”
produces neurological patterns associated with subjective experiences described as love.
Studies on the more-or-less monogamous prairie vole, for example, suggest that a neurotransmitter called oxytocin is important to mate bonding
Oxytocin interacts with another transmitter, pleasure-inducing dopamine.See more at blog.wired.com
 

In humans, brain regions associated with dopamine are activated in mothers looking at pictures of their children, and lovers at each other ” and, perhaps instructively, in drug addicts taking heroin or cocaine.

To Young, all this means that science may soon treat lovelessness as easily as it now treats depression and anxiety. “Drugs that manipulate brain systems at whim to enhance or diminish our love for another may not be far away,” he writes.

Not so fast, said Fisher.

The alterations required to manipulate love, she said, are likely so complex and far-reaching as to be unattainable in a pill. “There are cognitive processes and limbic reactions associated with basic emotions,” said Fisher. “And you can change brain chemistry, but you’re still not going to change memories and experiences in a human being.”

Perceptions: With Age, Memories Carry Less Emotion

Amplifyd from www.nytimes.com
Younger people, it appears, take a dimmer view of the past than their elders, and it might be because they process and retain memories differently
Researchers showed 180 pictures to 15 people in their 20s and to 15 older than 65, asking them to rate the pictures as emotionally negative, positive or neutral while their brains were monitored with functional M.R.I
After a break of 30 to 45 minutes, they were tested on their ability to recall the pictures
The M.R.I. results showed that older people were processing the negative pictures in different parts of the brain from the ones used by the younger people
regions used for rational thinking rather than feeling
older adults remembered fewer negative pictures
“In the emotion detection region of the brain, we saw similar activity in the old and young,” he said. “Older people have preserved emotional reactivity, but they are better able to control those emotions, and this control influences their memory for negative information.”See more at www.nytimes.com
 

This is a very interesting result: It seems that emotional maturity, corresponds to one’s ability to edit his own memories.

Blind, Yet Seeing: The Brain’s Subconscious Visual Sense

Amplifyd from www.nytimes.com
The man, a doctor left blind by two successive strokes, refused to take part in the experiment. He could not see anything, he said, and had no interest in navigating an obstacle course ” a cluttered hallway ” for the benefit of science. Why bother?
When he finally tried it, though, something remarkable happened. He zigzagged down the hall, sidestepping a garbage can, a tripod, a stack of paper and several boxes as if he could see everything clearly. A researcher shadowed him in case he stumbled.
The study, which included extensive brain imaging, is the most dramatic demonstration to date of so-called blindsight, the native ability to sense things using the brain’s primitive, subcortical ” and entirely subconscious ” visual system. See more at www.nytimes.com
 

Blurring the Boundary Between Perception and Memory

Amplifyd from www.sciam.com
Perception is mathematically impossible.
This might seem like a bold statement”after all, you are perceiving these letters right now”but it’s nonetheless true.
our visual systems have more to go on than just bare perceptual input. They use heuristics and short cuts, based on the physics and statistics of the natural world, to make the “best guesses” about the nature of reality
Just as we interpret a two-dimensional drawing as representing a three-dimensional object, we interpret the two-dimensional visual input of a real scene as indicating a three-dimensional world.
Our perceptual system makes this inference automatically, using educated guesses to fill in the gaps and make perception possible.
It turns out that our brains use the same intelligent guessing process to reconstruct the past, in addition to using it help perceive the worldSee more at www.sciam.com
 

Memory itself is not like a video-recording, with a moment-by-moment sensory image. In fact, it’s more like a puzzle: we piece together our memories, based on both what we actually remember and what seems most likely given our knowledge of the world. Just as we make educated guesses in perception, our minds’ best educated guesses help “fill in the gaps” of memory, reconstructing the most plausible picture of what happened in our past.

The most striking demonstration of the minds’ guessing game occurs when we find ways to fool the system into guessing wrong. When we trick the visual system, we see a “visual illusion””a static image might appear as if it’s moving, or a concave surface will look convex. When we fool the memory system, we form a false memory”a phenomenon made famous by researcher Elizabeth Loftus, who showed that it is relatively easy to make people remember events that never occurred. As long as the falsely remembered event could plausibly have occurred, all it takes

Distorted Body Images: A Quick and Easy Way to Reduce Pain

Amplifyd from www.sciam.com
The body image is a mental representation of one’s physical appearance, constructed by the brain from past experiences and present sensations. It is an essential component of self-identity, which, when altered, can have dramatic effects on how one perceives oneself.
body image distortions can have bizarre consequences. Otherwise healthy people report that they have always percived a part of their body as feeling “wrong,” and opt to have it removed by amputation; some brain-damaged or psychiatric patients experience alien hand syndrome, in which they deny ownership of a limb, and insist that it is under the control of external forces.
a study published recently in the journal Current Biology shows that a simple manipulation of the visual image of one’s body can significantly alter the perception of pain. These findings have important implications for how clinicians manage the treatment of pain.See more at www.sciam.com
 

For the study, Lorimer Moseley of Oxford University and his colleagues recruited 10 participants, all of whom suffer from chronic pain in their right arm. The participants were asked to perform a set of movements with their right arm, under different conditions. In one condition, they observed their limb through a pair of binoculars, which magnified their hand to twice its normal size; in another, the binoculars were inverted so that their hands appeared smaller than they actually were.

As they performed the arm movements, the participants were asked to rate the amount of pain they experienced. Each one reported that the pain they felt became markedly worse when they moved their limb. Surprisingly though, every participant also reported that the extent to which their pain increased depended on how their vision had been manipulated. They reported the greatest increase in pain when they saw a magnified view of their hand, and the smallest increase when their hands were minified.

New Discovery Could Rejuvenate the Brain

Amplifyd from www.physorg.com
Researchers at The University of British Columbia have discovered why the brain loses its capacity to re-grow connections and repair itself, knowledge that could lead to therapeutics that “rejuvenate” the brain.
The study, published today in The EMBO Journal, identified a set of proteins — calpain and cortactin, which regulate and control the sprouting of neurons — a mechanism known as neural plasticity.
Neurons, or nerve cells, process and transmit information by electrochemical signalling and are the core components of the brain and spinal cord. During development, growing neurons are relatively plastic and can sprout new connections, however their plasticity levels drop rapidly as they mature and become integrated into neuronal networks.
This discovery is exciting because we now know that neurons haven’t lost their capacity to re-grow connections, but instead are under constant repression by the protein calpainSee more at www.physorg.com
 

“If we can target therapies that block this mechanism, then neurons should be able to sprout new connections, therefore stimulating the brain’s ability to repair its wiring network.”

The research reveals that the loss of plasticity is due to the protein calpain actively blocking the protein cortactin, which is responsible for the sprouting of new connections. The researchers reduced calpain activity in animal models to unlock the sprouting potential of neurons and found that when calpain activity is reduced neural plasticity is enhanced.

Google’s Secret Weapon: MapReduce

Amplifyd from discussionleader.hbsp.com
Google’s stock is now down more than 50% year to date but the Google guys don’t seem to be concerned. Here’s why
Most people think the reason is because Google dominates search. But Google is building a new secret weapon that has more to do with the brain than search.
The effort is called MapReduce, a simple yet powerful software program that enables Google to use the Internet to think.
MapReduce does what our brains do all the time: It categorizes (Maps) key pieces of information, distributes it across its server farm of PCs, and then eliminates (Reduces) irrelevant data (computers–unlike MapReduce and the brain–soak in everything).
Does this sound like the perfect computer? Think again.
This is not even your typical computer: one that is stable, logical, and failsafe. Instead, it is error prone, strapped together with Velcro (literally) and unreliable
it is the same paradox that makes the brain work, wherein its seeming imperfections are what make MapReduce (and the brain) so powerfulSee more at discussionleader.hbsp.com
 

As the inventors of MapReduce noted in a recent paper, “It has been used across a wide range of domains within Google including: large-scale machine learning problems; clustering problems…; extracting data to produce reports of popular queries; extracting properties of Web pages for new experiments and products…; processing of satellite imagery data; language model processing for statistical machine translation, and; large-scale graph computation.” Or in other words, the tasks Google performs are similar to the functions performed by the brain: learning, categorization, vision and language.